Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > Sardelac Sanitarium

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 27, 2006, 10:27 PM // 22:27   #1
Krytan Explorer
 
LoKi Foxfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florida
Guild: One Corgi Army {OCA}
Profession: R/Rt
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

This is a pretty simple suggestion or wish:

Add PvE areas like FoW or UW which don't allow for henchmen and make them into 12 or 24 man events.

Make them an optional seperate level of progression for PvE guilds to participate in. Instead of just having a primary mission line to complete, players could group together and make progression through a series of ever more difficult optional missions for special items and titles. Each area could have different types of enemies and require special strategies and excellent teamwork to beat. The rewards would be greater for each raid mission that is completed and with each area dropping unique items for that mission. Maybe they could even be made into variable missions with different bosses and routes to take. Instead of being forced to beat the same mission every time, different groups could take different objectives to complete.

I guess this is asking for a lot, and I don't really expect to see anything of this WoW/EQ1 calibre type PvE content but I guess a dream is a dream....

Last edited by cosyfiep; Jun 05, 2016 at 03:57 AM // 03:57..
LoKi Foxfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2006, 10:38 PM // 22:38   #2
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Guild: Wandering Oracles of Time
Profession: Rt/N
Default

If it's optional, and optional ONLY, let me repeat myself, optional, as in NOT REQUIRED, then yeah, I'm fine with it. I just don't want this to become another WoW.
Morrandir Gurthring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 02:15 AM // 02:15   #3
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Profession: E/Rt
Default

I dont see any need to add content that requires a larger party. It's hard enough getting enough people as it is.

What I would like to see, though, are massive bosses with multiple hit zones.

Say you have a giant golem walking along, and the warriors have to attack its feet to slow it down and make it fall over, whilst rangers have to run up a nearby cliff to fire arrows at its eyes to blind it....

Then it falls over, and everyone runs over to its head and tries to do damage before it gets up again, and so on.


You can think of similar set pieces that apply to multiple monsters... eg, sieging a monster stronghold, where they have patrols, scouts, guards and a boss. They communicate with each other, so aggroing a scout will make it run away and call a powerful patrol etc.
Rieselle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 04:11 AM // 04:11   #4
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

I wouldn't mind seeing things like require PvE teams to work in tandem to achieve a single goal, i.e. one group distracts enemies, while another sneaks in behind to... capture the base or something. However, Rieselle made a good point; 24 people would be too much. Another thing to taake into consideration is that many people can reach level 20 by the time they reach the Desert in Prophecies, and yet you don't really see many high-level enemies until you reach the Shiverpeaks, and even then they are wimps. It's incredibly easy, albeit time-consuming, to kill everything in each zone in the Southern Shiverpeaks, even with henchman.

So I would opt for more high-level areas, missions, and quests. That wouldn't be too difficult for ANET, and it really isn't an unreasonable request. But in order to truly satisfy PvE players' need for end-game content, ANET needs to make high level farming areas (set low drop rates, and just let people farm - a lot of us like to farm every once in a while), as well as replayable missions/quests like the OP described. There's nothing wrong with throwing a bone to the PvE-ers, even if it does smack of a WoW type game style.
Magnus_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 06:40 AM // 06:40   #5
Krytan Explorer
 
bigwig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Guild: #Dismantle
Default

i'd actually like to see more variety in group sizes. does everything have to be a group of 8? i'd be interested in tackling high level zones in groups of 6 or 4. or yes, larger numbers.
bigwig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 07:05 AM // 07:05   #6
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Kuja's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MA
Guild: Kame
Profession: Mo/W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rieselle
I dont see any need to add content that requires a larger party. It's hard enough getting enough people as it is.

What I would like to see, though, are massive bosses with multiple hit zones.

Say you have a giant golem walking along, and the warriors have to attack its feet to slow it down and make it fall over, whilst rangers have to run up a nearby cliff to fire arrows at its eyes to blind it....

Then it falls over, and everyone runs over to its head and tries to do damage before it gets up again, and so on.


You can think of similar set pieces that apply to multiple monsters... eg, sieging a monster stronghold, where they have patrols, scouts, guards and a boss. They communicate with each other, so aggroing a scout will make it run away and call a powerful patrol etc.
That's just simply a different game, though would be cool
Kuja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 08:08 AM // 08:08   #7
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Belgium
Guild: Five Tigers [HAN]
Profession: W/Mo
Default

Quote:
I dont see any need to add content that requires a larger party. It's hard enough getting enough people as it is.

What I would like to see, though, are massive bosses with multiple hit zones.

Say you have a giant golem walking along, and the warriors have to attack its feet to slow it down and make it fall over, whilst rangers have to run up a nearby cliff to fire arrows at its eyes to blind it....

Then it falls over, and everyone runs over to its head and tries to do damage before it gets up again, and so on.


You can think of similar set pieces that apply to multiple monsters... eg, sieging a monster stronghold, where they have patrols, scouts, guards and a boss. They communicate with each other, so aggroing a scout will make it run away and call a powerful patrol etc.
that sounds alot like LOTR
master kisho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 09:54 AM // 09:54   #8
Div
I like yumy food!
 
Div's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where I can eat yumy food
Guild: Dead Alley [dR]
Profession: Mo/R
Default

the deep and urgoz are already similar to what ur describing in the 12-man "raids".
Div is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 10:23 AM // 10:23   #9
/retired
 
jackie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the Beach
Default

Well, so far Guild Wars doesn't have 'saving system' where you could log off in some huge & time consuming instance and come back later to finish things off. Therefore bringing in big raids that could last whole night & day would be only for the hardcore PvE'rs (which 90% of this community is ).

But that concerns only the size of some raid-mission. For the 8-12 player limit, I bet Anet will continue increasing party size. Level Cap 20 kinda forces it because one way to 'develop' your character then is to experience greater/more epic size challenges. Otherwise we would feel just playing a game with same difficulty over and over again, only with new skins.
jackie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 12:49 PM // 12:49   #10
Wilds Pathfinder
 
gamecube187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Default

No larger groups please. That would be a nightmare to get into. Its already hard to get full groups for some areas, and the amount of people in the party isn't nearly as high. Unless there is someway to get a HUGE number of players to be there and want to get into the large groups, so you can easily join a group at all times, then no, no, and no.

Also, please now raids like WoW. If I wanted stuff like that (which I don't), then I would play WoW. I say smaller groups with harder enemies, like the missions for the dragon festival. Those were fun, but still hard.

And the huge enemies with different parts to hit sounds cool. Maybe in a later mission with 2 teams in one of the chapters to come?
gamecube187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 12:56 PM // 12:56   #11
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Default

No henchies, no go IMO. I've had my fill with PuGs and refuse to deal with the migraines that seem to follow the common PuG.
Either it's henchies, friends and guildies or nothing.
Would love to see some more end game content though, GW needs it badly - However, it seem Anet enjoys locking up end game content behind favor and faction farming... so I don't see any real end game content coming till Anet removes the worst features in GW... that being favor and faction farming ties to the elite missions.
WasAGuest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 01:22 PM // 13:22   #12
Krytan Explorer
 
Raziel665's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Guild: Defenders of the Blackblade [DotB]
Profession: N/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rieselle
What I would like to see, though, are massive bosses with multiple hit zones.

Say you have a giant golem walking along, and the warriors have to attack its feet to slow it down and make it fall over, whilst rangers have to run up a nearby cliff to fire arrows at its eyes to blind it....

Then it falls over, and everyone runs over to its head and tries to do damage before it gets up again, and so on.
Sounds more like Shadow of the Collossus, wich pwns.
Raziel665 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 03:00 PM // 15:00   #13
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Default

If stuff like that gave titles and items with different, cool skins, then it'd be OK. If it provided more powerful items (which would then become prerequisite to stay competitive), then not.

As for party size, I think by the time chapter 3 is out we'll be ready for 12-man parties... the number of classes is growing, you see. Bigger than that would become really unmanageable. 4-man teams against strong enemies, the support classes would have a really hard time getting a group, it'd be all tank/nuker/monk, with little to no variation...
Solar_Takfar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 21, 2006, 08:23 AM // 08:23   #14
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Minnesota
Guild: Six Six Six {sSs}
Profession: Me/A
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by gamecube187
No larger groups please. That would be a nightmare to get into.
I tend to disagree because of two things: 1) Missions that require these larger teams could easily be filled at places such as Kaineng Center and Lions Arch. 2) The Guild Wars universe has expanded to the point where the community is no longer large enough to populate it's epic scale. By providing these grandious missions in areas where traffic is guaranteed it would increase the playability of the game tenfold.

Quote:
Its already hard to get full groups for some areas, and the amount of people in the party isn't nearly as high. Unless there is someway to get a HUGE number of players to be there and want to get into the large groups, so you can easily join a group at all times, then no, no, and no.
I believe that it really is HARD to get full groups in many areas. I have seen at least one town completely deserted: The Aurios Mine. It stays deserted for great lengths of time and I haven't ever seen enough people there to start a mission, which it does have a mission.

Quote:
Also, please no raids like WoW. If I wanted stuff like that (which I don't), then I would play WoW. I say smaller groups with harder enemies, like the missions for the dragon festival. Those were fun, but still hard.
We are all frustrated because of the difficulty that lies within gathering a group in an almost deserted towns. Again, if strategically placed the larger missions could theoretically be easy to get into. To easily solve the other concerns we could be given the option of joining the mission randomly or with an assembled team (both options are in the game already, they'd just have to insert the options as separate buttons).

Quote:
And the huge enemies with different parts to hit sounds cool. Maybe in a later mission with 2 teams in one of the chapters to come?
I believe that this is an awesome idea. I would like to see a variety of these type of monsters, not just end-game or elite bosses but ones that freely roam the countryside in certain areas of the map.
Bitmaster Nulflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 21, 2006, 01:56 PM // 13:56   #15
Grotto Attendant
 
Mordakai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kyhlo
Profession: W/
Default

I'm guessing the Elite mission in Nightfall will be 12-man, just like the Elite Missions in Factions.

More than 12? I don't know, even WoW is scaling back it's "Epic" content, because it was simply too hard to get groups of 40+ together.

I could see Elite missions where two 12 person teams work together, though.


If we're going to increase the size of parties, then the "LFG" function must be improved! (I should be improved anyway, but that's another thread...)
Mordakai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 21, 2006, 02:23 PM // 14:23   #16
Furnace Stoker
 
Knightsaber Sith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Guild: Few Fallen Heroes [FFH]
Profession: W/E
Default

As has been stated; there are 12 man pve areas called elite missions.
Knightsaber Sith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 21, 2006, 02:28 PM // 14:28   #17
Wilds Pathfinder
 
gabrial heart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Guild: Beautiful Peoples Club [LIPO]
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

This belongs in sardelac...
gabrial heart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 21, 2006, 04:09 PM // 16:09   #18
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Cloudpiercer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Profession: R/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by holymasamune
the deep and urgoz are already similar to what ur describing in the 12-man "raids".
They are exactly what he is describing. And I believe Nightfall will have more but without the need to catch a ferry there.

I want more gods to have there own "planes" though... similar to Grenths UW or Balthazars FOW. What about Dwayna, Lyssa and Melandru?
Cloudpiercer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 21, 2006, 08:54 PM // 20:54   #19
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Guild: Pearl of Great Price
Profession: R/Mo
Default

12-man are nice. I love that they are bigger than the 8-man, and challenging but not so huge that it becomes zerg-fest or hard to get a group. 12 MAYBE 16 person teams are about as far as I'd like to see this game grow.
Durik Lakmor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 21, 2006, 09:27 PM // 21:27   #20
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: doa
Profession: Mo/
Default

I too would like to see some new high end areas from the other gods in TOA as well. Been waiting for it since I heard factions was coming out!

Or the smaller multiple team idea sounds like fun as well, sort of similar to what you have to do at the beginning of the Deep. But if an entire area was designed around tight coordination between 3-4 teams of 4 or 5, it would provide an interesting challenge - similar to what AB is now, or something like the squads in the battlefield series.

Ironically I just read the other day in PC mag about the latest upcoming addon for WoW dicontinuing 40 man raids. They're going to focus on smaller groups requiring more coordination skills or something
saphir is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:48 PM // 13:48.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("